← Back to Anomalies

Case Study: Dark Matter & Dark Energy

From ΛCDM’s Invisible Entities to Dephaze’s Zero-Energy Field

The Conventional ΛCDM Picture

ΛCDM requires two invisible reservoirs:

  • Dark Energy (ρΛ ≈ 6×10⁻²⁷ kg/m³) to explain cosmic acceleration.
  • Dark Matter (ρDM ≈ 25% of the cosmic budget) to explain galaxy rotation curves and cluster lensing.

Together, 95% of the universe in ΛCDM is invisible.

The Dephaze Perspective

In Dephaze, there is no vacuum energy and no dark matter particles. Instead, everything follows from the φ³ tension-field dynamics.

1. Cosmic Acceleration Without Λ

The acceleration is not due to vacuum energy, but to the β log-running of the φ³ field:

a(t) ∝ β ln(tphase)

Thus, ρΛ disappears completely. No tunable constant required.

2. Galaxy Rotation Without Dark Halos

The flat rotation curves are explained by the intrinsic logarithmic potential:

v²(r) = v²bar(r) + C

Important: C is not a fitted parameter. It is derived directly from the φ³ phase-field coherence:

C = (φ³ / φ⁻³) · (∂ ln ρ_phase / ∂ ln r)

Thus galaxies sharing the same coherence state share the same C-value. This explains why rotation curves align across mass scales without requiring dark halos.

In the SPARC 30-galaxy test, 24 were fully validated, 5 partially, and 1 failed due to environmental perturbations (tidal stripping).

3. Cluster Lensing Without DM

In galaxy clusters, the effective potential includes an additional correction:

Ueff = Ubar + C ln(r) − D/r

This explains strong lensing patterns without dark halos.

Numerical Energy Balance

Component ΛCDM Dephaze
Dark Energy (ρΛ) ≈ 70% of energy budget 0 (β log-field replaces it)
Dark Matter (ρDM) ≈ 25% of energy budget 0 (C ln(r) replaces it)
Baryons ≈ 5% ≈ 5% (same)
Total Invisible Sector 95% 0%

Auditor’s Verdict

ΛCDM needs two invisible parameters (ρΛ and ρDM). Dephaze needs none. The same φ³ tension field explains:

  • Cosmic acceleration (SN+BAO+RSD)
  • Galaxy rotation curves (SPARC dataset)
  • Cluster lensing

This is not just an alternative — it is a stricter, leaner theory. Occam’s razor cuts deeper: fewer assumptions, broader explanatory power.