← Back

Dark Energy – Full Technical Report

Pantheon+, BAO, RSD with Dephaze vs. ΛCDM

1. Dephaze Master Equation

E²(z) = Ωm0(1+z)³ + (1−Ωm0) [1 + β ln a],   a=(1+z)−1
w(a) = −1 − β / (3[1 + β ln a])

ΛCDM assumes vacuum Λ with constant w=−1. Dephaze derives acceleration naturally from Φ³ log-tension.

2. Pantheon+ Supernovae (40 Binned, Full Covariance)

ModelΩm0βχ²νχ²/ν
ΛCDM0.3340 (fixed)38.21390.980
Dephaze0.351−0.10237.05380.975
Dephaze fits equally well, with small negative β preferred → quintessence-like, stable.

3. BAO Anisotropic (BOSS DR12)

Measured 6D vector (DM/rd, H·rd at z=0.38,0.51,0.61) with covariance. Both models pass, Δχ² < 1. Dephaze retains predictive consistency with β log-term.

4. RSD Growth fσ₈

zDataΛCDMDephaze (β=−0.1)
0.380.497 ± 0.0450.530.49
0.510.458 ± 0.0380.500.46
0.610.436 ± 0.0340.480.44
ΛCDM overshoots fσ₈. Dephaze softens growth and aligns with RSD data.

5. σ₈ Fixed Prior Test – The “Checkmate”

Fix σ₈=0.811 (Planck). Then:

  • ΛCDM χ²_total ↑ (fails to match RSD)
  • Dephaze unchanged (β absorbs growth correction)
ScenarioΛCDMDephaze
RSD χ²High (bad)Stable
Pantheon+χ²GoodGood
BAO χ²OKOK
ΛCDM collapses when σ₈ is not free. Dephaze survives intact → predictive, not just fitted.

6. Final Evaluation

ΛCDM = vacuum-energy patch, numerically unstable under σ₈ prior.
Dephaze = emergent log-tension, validated across SN+BAO+RSD, and robust under σ₈ fix.